| To: | erlug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Erlug] una variabile antipatica |
| From: | Massimiliano Masserelli <negro@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 26 Apr 2003 02:13:50 +0200 |
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 07:42:36PM +0200, Maurizio Lemmo - Tannoiser wrote: > Potrei capire se _nessuna_ variabile venisse portata, ma mi sfugge > perche` solo questa viene ignorata (e solo da fluxbox). flubox ridefinisce TEMP? -- Massimiliano Masserelli ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A real person has two reasons for doing anything ... a good reason and the real reason. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Erlug] DAT DDS: dubbi, incertezze, Matteo Sgalaberni |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re:[Erlug] una variabile antipatica, Paolo Andreoni |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Erlug] una variabile antipatica, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Erlug] una variabile antipatica, Nando Santagata |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |