ciao a tutti.
sto raccogliendo del materiale per la mia tesi e, sfogliando msdn
online --il mio abbonamento e' terminato qualche tempo fa e non ho
piu' soldi da spendere per msdn...-- mi sono imbattuto in un articolo
interessante su active directory.
non ho capito un gran che' di ad perche' ho letto velocemente --e non
mi interessa--, ma vi riporto un breve passaggio che mi e' piaciuto
assai:
+++
Choosing a DNS Server
Don't assume that you'd be foolish to host your AD on a BIND (or
Lucent Technologies' Lucent QIP or other third-party) DNS server. BIND
is quite capable of working with AD--and has been since Win2K's
inception.
To convince myself that AD and BIND get along, I spent a Saturday last
year blowing up my existing three-domain AD forest and rebuilding it
without using Microsoft DNS servers. Instead, I used MandrakeSoft's
Linux-Mandrake 7.1 and the version of BIND available at the time. In
addition to going smoothly, the process of building the AD forest
seemed to go a bit faster than it did with a Win2K-based DNS server. I
used the BIND-based DNS structure to support my AD for several months
thereafter, and during that time I didn't hit a single snag.
--tratto da windows 2000 magazine, july 2001
saluti.
--
Gianni "bugbarbeq" Rondinini, 26+15, RA, 193, 152
VBR - Vero Birro Romagnolo®, diffidate dalle imitazioni!
BatMobile EVO Fast Driver - Kawasaki "Gas Gas" ZZ-R 1100
ICQ# 36893168 - IRCNet: bugbarbeq, @ on #linux-it & #NetBSD
On contrary of popular belief, Unix *IS* user friendly:
it just appears to be selective who it is friend with
|